stage 3!

U.S.A. today's editorial about the Libya and Egypt that the attacks deserve a careful and thought out response. U.S.A. Today's editorial points out that "generalizations don't apply," and "President Obama, who struck the appropriate, level-headed tone in his initial response to the attacks" The editorial staff I completely agree with in the sense that Obama did use the correct response. They state how our ambassador helped support Libya when Gadhafi was attacking them. They even describe Libyan's trying to help the ambassador during the attacks on the embassy. The U.S.A. Today's editorial staff seems very credible to the point that what they say makes lots of sense when looking at things outside the box. Obama doesn't want to generalize the protesters as terrorists etc. especially during an election year. Why should we generalize protesters as terrorists not everyone that day wanted someone today...well maybe not an ambassador but the point is also why do we need to attack people that most of them were protesting. I believe that area in the world does not like western influence and don't find it hard to enact violence towards an American embassy. The U.S. did beef up security in embassies so that outbreaks like the one that had happened don't happen again. I do believe an initial military response would be futile and unneeded. This issue of religion and movies is something the Libyan people need to figure out on their own. The U.S. needs to stand aside say sorry for our freedom of speech and move on. We can't be the savior of the world every day.