Commentary about life and choices

Reading your blog. I feel that there is a right and a wrong in the statements you make. I understand that it's your opinion and it's for school, but I'll offer my commentary on this. I my self am a man and I am pro choice. My reasoning is because no one really knows when to consider a pregnant women's "fetus" and actual live human being. I understand that weeks or a few months before the child should be born is too close to call. What I'm saying is, is that I believe that when the "fetus" or baby is ready and able to enter the world, then that is a living human being. I do feel that 2 months after conception or even more is okay. I understand there is emotional and physical effects that happen to women. No one wants to have an abortion. Which leads to another topic about birth control and sexual education. We lack proper Sexual education and because of this many teens and adults are suffering in America. Other westernized nations don't have as big an issue as the U.S. does. Also under circumstances of rape etc. It's the woman's body. I'd rather have a child come into the world ready with a family that is able to support it. Not coming to a teenager that is just a child her self. It creates more poverty and more families on welfare. Instead of limiting something that doesn't happen as often as the media makes it out to be. A woman should have that right, if there is an issue than there is science that will prove whether to consider the fetus completely human or not. This is a males perspective on abortion.I believe the woman should have a right to chose, and it's not that it's intentional. There is protection ready and available and thanks to Obamacare women now may have birth control on their insurance. It's about teaching and informing people about sex and what can and cannot happen. I feel that sex is such a huge taboo. There is a proper and safe way to have sex and by educating people there will a reduction in abortions and unsafe sex.

U.S. National Government aid

The editorial I found on USAToday explains the Governments role on the Sandy hurricane. The beginning of the editorial describes that the people of the United States feel the Government is obligated to send for aid or help out in any way possible during environmental disasters. I agree with this because I believe that our Government is for the people by the people. Whatever we want the Government to do, we have elected officials that must follow what we say(in order to get re-elected). I believe that we pay taxes to support programs that are used to help sick and hungry American's that have been affected by such disasters. A prime example for why we consider issues like these important is because it's something that had happened to people with out their permission. I could understand the whole bailing out GM, because of the mistakes of people being an issue. When lives are at stack and people are put into positions against their will like with Sandy. Americans feel that such environmental disasters are on par with foreign invaders threatening and killing Americans. Death is a serious issue, especially in your native country. If the Government isn't effective domestically then how can it be effective any where else? For example what happened with hurricane Katrina. People are still suffering over something Government had the power to fix. Lack of Government control over environmental relief is concerning and has been fixed to an extent that there is bipartisan. After all I believe we are all one race and that is United States Americans. (: